Big Foot might be real. A couple Big Foot Hunters found a dead Big Foot body in the woods of north Georgia. They are having a press conference today to show pictures and DNA evidence. Why not have the body at the press conference? Something doesn’t seem quite right. A press conference for a Big Foot find with only pictures.  The Big Foot Hunters say there were other Big Foots close by and aren’t disclosing the exact location to protect the other Big Foots.

I’ve been hearing about Big Foot since the famous blurred picture of a giant BIg Foot walking away looking back at the camera. The Big Foot hunters found this body in North Georgia woods. Wouldn’t you think there would be a better chance of finding a Big Foot in the remote areas of Wyoming, Colorado or Northern California? And there were other Big Foots right there, but they don’t have (or haven’t published yet) pictures of a group or a family of Big Foots.

There is a lot of anticipation for today’s press conference, sorry, but I’m one of the skeptics for several reasons. No body, only pictures. What is the DNA evidence going to prove without a body? Big Foot hunters just happened to find this body? If it was someone just hiking in the woods, it would be more believable. It sounds more like a publicity stunt.

By the time everyone figures out this is a hoax, the publicity will have died down and the story that it was a hoax won’t even be a headline. I may watch at 12n PDT just to see what evidence they are actually going to show. If it’s just one picture, it’s a hoax. Big Foot Hunters going out in the woods hunting for Big Foot with no camera? Sounds a little fishy already.

CNN Story